At long last a woman has been
elected to the second highest office in the United States of America, but not
yet to the presidency. Hillary Clinton
held out that hope on behalf of many of us, but her “sins” were magnified,
largely, I think, because she was a woman.
Witness the excusal of even bigger sins by the man who was chosen over
her by the electoral college. Boys will
be boys, but women still must be above reproach to be acceptable.
So many events of the last decade
continue to remind me that, even though we thought we had successfully fought
the battle for equal rights of women years ago, we are not yet there. The “me too” movement gave voice to women’s
victimization. It encouraged me to speak
out for the first time about my own rape nearly fifty years ago and to publicly
name a serial sexual harasser years after his abuses were covered up. The death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader
Ginsburg reminded us of the important work she did to improve the status of
women in this country—both through her legal work and as a role model. And so, I am moved to write about my own
experiences with the struggle to overcome and celebrate being born female.
Helen Reddy wrote in 1971 what, in
many ways, became the theme song for my generation of women.
I am woman, hear
me roar
In numbers too
big to ignore
. . . . .
Oh yes, I am
wise
But it’s wisdom
born of pain.
Yes, I’ve paid
the price
But look how
much I gained.
If I have to, I
can do anything.
I am strong.
I am invincible.
I am woman.[i]
I credit my parents with my initial
push toward becoming an independent, achievement-oriented woman, although they
were sometimes a bit miffed at what they had wrought. I also credit the models of my strong
grandmothers. My Grandmother Elizabeth,
for whom I was named, overcame great hardships to perfect her piano and singing
skills. She left home in 1920 at the age
of 22—unheard of in those days—to play the organ for the silent movie house in
Newburg, Missouri and to teach piano lessons.
There she met and married a railroad man, Ben Bull. They had four children, the oldest of whom
was my father Joe. Ben went out on
strike with his union and lost his job, just before the 1929 depression
hit. Through all of their difficult times,
Elizabeth was able to keep the family afloat by bartering piano and voice
lessons.
My Grandmother Ollie left her much
older, possibly abusive husband in Oregon in 1930, taking five-year-old
Margaret, the youngest of her eight children and my mother, with her to
Missouri. Ollie had to put Margaret in a
children’s home until she was able to care for her and some of the older
children again. Ollie worked as a
waitress, a cook, and eventually ran a boarding house.
My father went to college on the GI
Bill after World War Two. He became an
aerospace engineer, eventually working on designs for the rocket engines that
launched Apollo and Gemini spacecraft.
He always encouraged us kids to do well in school, helping us with
homework when needed and praising us for good grades. I don’t recall there ever having been a
discussion of whether we would go to college, just where we would go. Like my older sister, Melinda, I opted for Baylor
University, located in our then-hometown of Waco, Texas.
While I had been an excellent
student in high school, graduating near the top of my class, I was a less
serious student at Baylor. There were
too many other things demanding my attention and energies. My parents and I had many arguments during
those years—about the Vietnam War, about our government’s policies, about what
I was going to do with my life, etc. I
was an able opponent, but Dad would try to punch holes in my logic or accuse me
of being naive. I reminded him often
that he had taught me to form my own opinions and encouraged me to be a
critical thinker. He just didn’t like it
when I came to different conclusions from his.
One of his financial threats was
that he would only pay my tuition (I was working to pay for my room and board
and other expenses) if I majored in something “useful” like education. I reluctantly changed my major from
philosophy and history to secondary education with a social studies
concentration. A few years later, when I
applied to attend law school at the University of Texas, Dad was appalled. “No man will ever marry you if you compete
with them,” he declared. I fell in love
and didn’t end up going to law school. Unfortunately,
the love affair didn’t pan out either.
Dad made the same argument a few
years later when I started graduate school, working toward a doctorate in
educational psychology. However, mid-way
through that degree, I did marry and that seemed to appease Dad for a
while. The marriage didn’t last long,
but my career did. After I married for a
second time, this time to a more stable and suitable man, Scott Danielson, Dad
could finally breathe a great sigh of relief.
He was especially pleased that Scott was an engineer and had some
interest in aerospace engineering. In
Dad’s eyes, I had achieved the ultimate and married a successful man.
One Christmas vacation, when I was
well into my career as a psychology professor at Moorhead State University, Dad,
my two brothers, and I were sitting together in the kitchen of my parents’
house. I don’t recall what prompted this
exchange, but I made an initial observation.
“You know Dad, I’m the one of your
kids who might have followed you into engineering, had you ever encouraged me
to do so,” I began. “I was good in math
and science and might have made a good engineer.”
“You could have done anything you
wanted,” he replied, somewhat off-handedly.
“No. You made me get a degree in education.”
“I did not,” he firmly asserted. “You could have majored in anything you
wanted.”
“No, Dad,” I persisted. “You threatened to cut off my tuition if I
didn’t major in something useful like education.”
He repeated, “You could have done
anything you wanted.”
“What would have been OK with you
besides teaching or nursing?” I wasn’t going to let him off the hook.
“You could have done anything.”
“Just give me one example of
something else that would have been OK with you, Dad.” I was baiting the poor
man.
“Well,” he sputtered in
frustration, “you could have majored in home economics.”
My brothers had been listening to,
but not participating in, this exchange.
With this answer, they both started laughing.
“Oh, Dad,” I sighed. “You still
don’t get it.”
My mother did not go to college
until my younger brothers did. She
earned a nursing degree in her forties, the only one among her siblings to go
to college. Mother had left home at
seventeen, going to California to work as a riveter in a defense plant. After my parents married, however, she settled
into the role of the traditional 1950s post-war wife, being responsible for
child rearing, housekeeping, and cooking. Reading her journals after her death,
I discovered that—even though she never would have said so in words—she
suffered from the malaise described so poignantly by Betty Freidan in her book The
Feminine Mystique.
Mother had dreams of doing
something else, of being something more.
But it took many years for her to assert herself and pursue her dream of
going to college and becoming a nurse.
In one of our conversations after I was a middle-aged adult, Mother
remarked, “Had I lived in a different time, I would have wanted a life like
yours.”
So, while my father pushed me and
then pulled back, my mother was silently cheering me on.
----------------------
While I was a student at Baylor in
the late 1960s, women were “protected” and held to different standards than the
men on campus. We lived in separate
dormitories, of course. There were
curfews in the women’s dorms but not in the men’s. We had to be in by, I think, ten on week
nights and midnight on weekends. The
doors were locked precisely at that time.
If a girl was late and had to knock for admission, she received “late
minutes.” After accumulating a certain
number (twenty maybe), she was “campused” for a weekend, meaning she could not leave
the dorm. Just to be sure everyone was
in and accounted for, our dorm rooms were checked each night shortly after
curfew.
Men could smoke on campus; women
could not. Women were not allowed to
wear pants on campus. When wearing
shorts to PE or to play intramural football, we had to cover our pants with a
raincoat. Along with protesting the
Vietnam War, during the 1969-70 academic year, we also lobbied for a change to
the pants rule. The thing that made this
rule so absurd was that this was the era of the miniskirt, and women often wore
skirts short enough to expose most of their upper thighs, but we could not
cover those same thighs with long pants.
Finally, it was decreed that women could wear pants on campus, but only
long pants and not blue jeans or shorts.
Neither pants nor miniskirts were
allowed among teachers, however. When I
started student teaching in the spring of 1970, my skirts had to reach the floor
when I was kneeling, which I had to do once in front of the high school
principal to prove that my skirt was long enough. My sister Melinda became a teacher, but had
to quit as soon as she started showing with her first pregnancy. It was considered indecent for children to be
exposed to a pregnant woman.
We found jobs in those days through
advertisements in the newspaper.
Openings were listed as “Help Wanted: Female” or “Help Wanted:
Male.” The “Female” list included
secretarial positions, waitressing jobs, medical or legal assistant positions,
and other such stereotypically- female positions. Even high-achieving women like Ruth Bader
Ginsburg were discriminated against in hiring in the 1960s. Unable to secure a job with a law firm after
her graduation at the top of her class at Columbia Law School, she turned to an
academic career instead, teaching first at Rutgers University School of Law and
later at Columbia Law School. Working
with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) during the 1970s, Ginsburg successfully
argued a number of sex-discrimination cases before the Supreme Court. [ii]
In the 1990s, I came across a
research report on the “feminization” of professions. Since I’m not writing a scholarly article, I
will not go looking for the exact reference, but will share here the gist of
the findings as I remember them. Professions
that were typically viewed as “female” paid less and held lower status than the
“male” professions. Females were
primarily teachers, while most school principals at the time were male. Doctors were male, nurses and technicians
were female. Attorneys were male and
paralegals were female. Through the late
seventies and eighties, things began to change as women entered a broader range
of professional fields. But an
interesting thing happened. As larger
numbers of women entered a field, men tended to leave it, and both salaries and
status declined. Two of the fields I
recall being cited as examples in this research study were accounting and real
estate. While accountants used to be
primarily men, by the 1990s, the vast majority were women. As women began to enter the world of
residential real estate, men tended to gravitate to commercial real
estate. There is significantly more
money to be made in commercial real estate as compared with residential.
The article also noted that the
fields of law, psychology, and medicine were moving toward “feminization,” with
its related losses in both salaries and status.
At the time, psychology was nearing a fifty-fifty split; I would guess
that now the majority of psychologists are women. There are more women entering law now than
men. In medicine, the number of total
women has increased, but they tend to enter the lower-paid specialties of
family practice, obstetrics/ gynecology, and pediatrics, leaving the more
lucrative specialties of surgery and oncology to men. Engineering remains a predominantly male
domain (87% of engineers were men in 2019) even though women have made significant inroads in the last few decades.
Women have always made less than men, even
when education levels and years of experience are entered into the equation. The gender pay gap has lessened over the past
fifty years, but it still exists, as women earn on average 81% of what men
earn, according to the annual “Gender Pay Gap Study 2020.”[iii]
---------------
During the 1970s, women began to
find their voices and took up a variety of issues of discrimination. Advocating to be able to wear pants on a
college campus or being allowed to teach through a pregnancy were just beginning
points for a vast movement against being second-class citizens who needed the
“protection” and “support” of a man.
Women in large numbers fought for access to birth control, the right to
make pregnancy decisions for themselves, the ability to enter into careers that
had previously been limited to men and to be paid equal wages, funding for girls’
sports on par with that spent on boys’ sports, affordable child care, and
many, many other issues.
Many of my high school and college
friends married soon after college graduation and began having children. I did not date anyone that I wanted to marry,
so had to find a career path in order to support myself. It took a few years to figure out what I
wanted to do, but I entered graduate school at the University of Colorado in
1973.
In 1975, I agreed to marry John
Sellers, a man I had first dated at Baylor and who had been pursuing me for several
years. It was a disastrous marriage for
many reasons, one of which was that he was emotionally unstable and could be physically
abusive. Usually, his outbursts were
scary (like the time he threw a glass which shattered against the wall inches
in front of my face), but I ended up in the emergency room once after he slugged
me in the face. Fortunately, nothing was
broken, but I did have quite a shiner for a couple of weeks afterwards. The attending physician asked me if I had
somewhere safe to go, and I said yes. I
went home, because after one of these outbursts, John was always apologetic and
loving. He cried when he saw my black eye
and bought me flowers the next day. And, he promised he would never hurt me
again. A promise he had made several times
before but could never keep.
As part of my graduate work, I took
a psychology of women course, which was a powerful experience for me in several
ways. For example, I learned that mine was
a classic case of the abuse cycle. The
abuser escalates toward an inevitable explosion. Sometimes the victim collaborates in that
escalation knowing the explosion is coming and wanting to get it over
with. Afterward the abuser is remorseful
and loving and makes all kinds of promises—I’ll get help, I’ll stop drinking,
I’ll never hit you again, etc. Many
women caught in this cycle are held hostage because of children and a lack of
economic resources.
In my case, though, we had no
children, and I was the primary wage earner.
Even though he had earned a master’s degree in journalism from
prestigious Columbia University, John had difficulty finding and keeping a
job. During our short marriage he had a
series of jobs—apartment manager, maintenance man, school bus driver—but he had
either been fired or quit each one after just a few months. So, when an opportunity arose for me to take
a paid school psychology internship nearly two hundred miles from Boulder, I jumped
at it. I did not invite John to come
along since it was only to be temporary.
I stayed away longer, however, and took the action necessary to end our
unhealthy relationship by filing for divorce in 1979.
Later in my life, I served on the
board of the YWCA in Fargo-Moorhead and was particularly interested in the
shelter it ran for women and children who had suffered domestic violence. I also taught a psychology of women course
whenever I could fit it into my schedule.
These classes had between seventy-five and ninety students, mostly
women, and were empowering to both the students and to me.
One year, several of the students in
that class came to me with complaints of inappropriate behavior on the part of
an esteemed male colleague in my department at Moorhead State University. Since this man had tried to kiss me one day
in my office, I readily related to their stories. They were afraid to confront him, so I went
with them to share their complaints with the president of the university. He listened and promised to investigate. The professor received a verbal reprimand and
was told to stop such behaviors, but I don’t think he did. The story I later heard was that this senior
professor, who was one of the university’s few faculty of color, threatened the
president with a discrimination lawsuit if any formal action was taken against
him.
I also taught psychology of women when
I was an administrator at Concordia College, a Lutheran liberal arts college. The official position of the campus pastor
was that homosexuality was a choice and a sin.
I asked my friend Kerry Lauer to come one day to share her personal
experiences with my class. Kerry had
grown up in a conservative religious community in the southwest and had
attended a church-related college where the campus pastor counseled her to ignore her attractions to women and marry a man in order "to be saved." She took his advice, married, and moved to
rural Minnesota to live with her husband’s family. After several years of living in misery, she
told her husband that she could not be the wife he deserved, that she had
always preferred women, and that for both their sakes, he should divorce
her. He did, and Kerry was banished from
the community in shame.
She eventually found a job, a
community that accepted her, and a life partner. However, she also pointed out that “coming
out” was not a once-and-done thing, but a continuing requirement. For example, every new doctor she visited
would ask about her need for birth control; securing a loan for the purchase of
a home caused some difficulty for two women; and new people who entered her
life often had a moment (or more) of pause at learning that her partner was
another woman. My students were
respectful and asked her good questions.
Kerry was very open about answering them. After she left, we had a thoughtful
conversation about Biblical teachings (you can do this in a Lutheran college)
and the realities of human experience.
Hopefully, such conversations broadened my students’ world views and
provided them with the information they needed to have such conversations
outside the classroom.
Given that same-sex marriage is now
legal, we tend to forget that until the 1980s and 1990s most states continued to
have laws on their books that made homosexual relationships illegal. So-called sodomy laws were still in place in
fourteen states in 2003 when the Supreme Court ruled that laws that prohibited private homosexual activity between consenting adults were unconstitutional.[iv]
---------------
In addition to teaching about
gender issues, I also conducted some research on sex differences. The first project was the basis of my master’s
thesis, written in 1977. I looked at a
concept called “fear of success” as the explanation for why many women did not
achieve what they were intellectually capable of. In essence, many bright women opted-out of
academic pursuits out of a fear that if they were too successful, they wouldn’t
be liked or find a male partner. Had I
listened to my father those decades earlier, I might also have minimized my
achievements in order to be more “acceptable” to men.
My other research interest emerged
from a finding in my doctoral dissertation research on mathematical problem
solving. I was studying the processes
people used in solving word problems.
Contrary to the belief popular at the time (1980) that women were not as
capable mathematically as men, I found no differences except on one very unique
problem. This word problem set up an
impossible situation in which a number of coins equaled a given amount;
however, the wording of the problem should lead to the answer that the
conditions could not be met and therefore there was no answer. Eighty percent of my male subjects came to
the correct conclusion, but fewer than twenty percent of my female subjects
did. The typical man would set up the
problem, solve it, get a negative number of coins and say, “there must be
something wrong with the problem.” In
this case, they had no difficulty rereading it and saying, oh yeah, you can’t
have this many dimes be worth more than this many quarters. In contrast, the typical woman would set up
the problem, solve the equations, get a negative number of coins, and say, “I
did something wrong.” She then either
retraced her steps or gave up in frustration with her “inability” to do math.
The best explanation I found for
this finding came from the attribution research of the time, that is, how people explain
(attribute) their success and failure in various situations. In general, when men were successful, they took
credit for it (I’m smart), and when they were unsuccessful, they tended to
blame some outside factor (hard problem, bad luck). In contrast, women who were successful tended
to credit outside factors (easy problem, good luck) and blame themselves for
failure (I’m dumb). I don’t know if more
recent research would continue to find this sex difference, but I found it to be very disturbing at the time.
My goal in teaching psychology of
women and in the mentoring I have done over the years has been to convince women
that they are indeed capable and that they should pursue whatever goals they
have for themselves without worrying about what others think of those
goals. I have never advocated career
over family. I think each of us has to
find the balance in life that works for us.
But I do know that women who want to achieve parity with men in the
workplace have to make some sacrifices and compromises along the way.
Thankfully, I found in Scott a life
partner who wasn’t ever threatened by my success, and in fact, was very
supportive of my career advancement. (I
will write more about that later.) While we were never able to have our own children, we did foster several and, along with many other couples, had to figure out how to balance child care and rearing with career
advancement. It is hard. Even more so for single parents shouldering that burden alone.
In some respects, women have come a
long way in the past fifty years, but we cannot let down our guard, and younger
generations will need to continue to carry the struggle for equality and equity into the
future. I, for one, will continue to sing: “I am woman, hear me roar. I am wise.
I am strong. I am
invincible. I am woman.”








